|
Cobalt Manticore
|
 |
« on: August 23, 2011, 06:03:12 PM » |
|
Just remembering how other online forums have that option. Proves to be quite handy here and there.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dani
|
 |
« Reply #1 on: August 23, 2011, 06:14:56 PM » |
|
We do have one. But I'm not sure if it hides actual posts, if that's your concern. It prevents people from sending/receiving pms and it also hides your presence on the forum when you're logged in.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Sometimes derailing the  out of an already what the topic is not enough. |
|
|
|
Neil Tathers
|
|
« Reply #2 on: August 23, 2011, 08:10:23 PM » |
|
Yeah, there is no ignore for actual posts, just PMs.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Cobalt Manticore
|
 |
« Reply #3 on: August 23, 2011, 09:14:19 PM » |
|
Just a concern in general. It's a guaranteed arguement ender.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
lama
iz doin it rite akshully
Global Moderator
Hero Member
Posts: 2516
|
|
« Reply #4 on: August 23, 2011, 09:43:51 PM » |
|
I ignore this.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Muad Dib
|
|
« Reply #5 on: August 23, 2011, 11:56:15 PM » |
|
I think it's actually a bad idea to hide posts of ignored people. Threads will start looking more awkward and what-the-:palm: like than they already do.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
YEAH SCOUTS!
|
|
|
|
Vetari
|
|
« Reply #6 on: August 24, 2011, 03:58:38 PM » |
|
Thread blocked. Seriously though. The internet is anonymous and impersonal as it is, it's pretty easy to just pretend the other person does not exist if you do not like them.  |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: August 24, 2011, 04:00:29 PM by Vetari »
|
Logged
|
 Forum Rule of the Month: * Try to stay on topic. Don't hijack threads (without a good reason).
Active Vicious |
|
|
lama
iz doin it rite akshully
Global Moderator
Hero Member
Posts: 2516
|
|
« Reply #7 on: August 24, 2011, 04:00:58 PM » |
|
I ignore this as well.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Josiah Winthrop
|
|
« Reply #8 on: August 24, 2011, 05:35:23 PM » |
|
I'm not digging it.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
What is the nature of your thoughts, gentlemen, when you say fuddle duddle or something like that?
-- PET
|
|
|
|
|
|
Josiah Winthrop
|
|
« Reply #10 on: August 24, 2011, 08:22:06 PM » |
|
It is looking 50/50 so its definitely not an atrocious idea, its just not my thing.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
What is the nature of your thoughts, gentlemen, when you say fuddle duddle or something like that?
-- PET
|
|
|
|
Cobalt Manticore
|
|
« Reply #11 on: August 24, 2011, 09:15:48 PM » |
|
Looks like it. As it Would Just BE an option, if it were on here, it would still be up to one's Free Choice to use it or not.  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Iceman
|
|
« Reply #12 on: August 24, 2011, 09:29:13 PM » |
|
I don't think seven votes is really a representative data set.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Twist - boner-inducingly handsome | ClickClick - guardian of the Dalpoki | Sympathetic Phil - hard-bitten mercenary and surly drunkard | Tkltchk - hungry, want eat | Fist McRhinopuncher - fairly self-explanatory "Iceman?" How is that? | Suggestions
|
|
|
|
Killian
|
|
« Reply #13 on: August 24, 2011, 10:37:23 PM » |
|
In any other case, but we're talking about Shartak here.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
 Most improved 2011 Most handsome 2011 Most likely to snap and hack everyone with an axe 2011 |
|
|
|
Muad Dib
|
|
« Reply #14 on: August 25, 2011, 03:17:23 AM » |
|
So, eight votes are from the same person?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
YEAH SCOUTS!
|
|
|
|
Poll
