Shartak The Official Shartak Forum
Click here to play NOW!
May 22, 2012, 10:42:01 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: Staff:
Jaqs, Johan Crichton, Lama, Simon and Vetari are moderators.
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Shartak Anti-Communists  (Read 1949 times)
0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.
Jenerix
Newbie
*
Posts: 6


View Profile
« Reply #15 on: March 23, 2007, 08:05:45 PM »

If you love freedom and dislike dreary anticapitalism, political assassinations, mass graves, slave-labor-camps, long queues for basic foodstuffs, and centralisation of all power under the iron-fisted rule by an authoritarian Communist Party headed by York-based hothead "Che" (or if you just dislike York-based hothead "Che"), then the Shartak Anti-Communists want YOU!

I believe you have your facts mixed up. You are thinking of the Stalin-ruled USSR. a few juicy facts to fill your brain: communism=all people have equal responsibility and get everything they need, socialism=ruled by working-class and almost communist. Stalin and USSR= NOT PROPER COMMUNIST. communism=good idea, not work well in reality, someone probably turn dictator. for more info on difference between Stalin and communism watch "animal farm", DON'T take the literal talking animal view, look at the hidden meaning, only way to bypass the editing etc.
heres something:
dreary anticapitalismcapitalism didn't work for them, political assassinations1)shouldn't have happened 2)happens in all government, mass gravesStalin went conspiracy crazy, thought everyone was against him, slave-labor-campsStalin went power-crazy, long queues for basic foodstuffsfair shares for all, and centralisation of all power under the iron-fisted rule by an authoritarian Communist PartyStalin gone power-mad, not communist

[/quote]
The communist colour scheme is primarily red.

Same as above, red was just for the USSR, not all communists. has to do with the bolshevik (might be spelt wrong, i admit) revolution.
Logged
Arminius
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 58



View Profile
« Reply #16 on: March 23, 2007, 08:22:57 PM »

I see that sneaky Che got to you Jenerix  Angry

Red liars!
Logged
Jenerix
Newbie
*
Posts: 6


View Profile
« Reply #17 on: March 24, 2007, 12:33:48 AM »

HEY!!! I AM NOT communist!!! Angry i am a pathetic loser type conformatist!!! however, i am taking history and under the circumstances for russia at the time it is clear why they wanted a system where they govern themselves. in countries where people are the epiphany of poor, a system of do what you can and get what you need works. the people who can do more work do, the people who need more get more. everyone gets what they need, everyone works together to get what they need. It works in theory but when tyrants find a way to get control it screws up.
Logged
Mark D. Stroyer
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 336


Danger is my middle name.


View Profile
« Reply #18 on: March 24, 2007, 12:38:44 AM »

Also, saying that, "Russia and China didn't/don't have real communism" is, in fact, a form of propaganda...

*Ahem.*

It also applies to North Korea, Cuba and Vietnam.
« Last Edit: March 24, 2007, 12:41:47 AM by Mark D. Stroyer » Logged


Mark D. Stroyer
Derby Rangers. Leader.
lama
iz doin it rite akshully
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2516



View Profile
« Reply #19 on: March 24, 2007, 03:10:36 AM »

however, i am taking history and under the circumstances for russia at the time it is clear why they wanted a system where they govern themselves.

Who do you refer to saying they?
Logged

Jenerix
Newbie
*
Posts: 6


View Profile
« Reply #20 on: March 24, 2007, 03:24:17 AM »

They.
the plural form of he/she/it. Used to refer to the plural of someone/thing that is not yourself our the person to whom you talk. (sorry,didn't have time to get a dictionary definition,had to improvise)
in this context they refers to the bolsheviks, (mansheviks? (something like that)) and all other political groups that all wanted to remove their autocracy in favour of communism

will that do? i hope so, i took a few seconds to come up with that! puff,pant,wheeze (collapses from tiredness)
Logged
lama
iz doin it rite akshully
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2516



View Profile
« Reply #21 on: March 24, 2007, 03:27:43 AM »

in this context they refers to the bolsheviks, (mansheviks? (something like that))

I'm amazed by the level of ignorance in the matters you claim to know a lot about. Maybe stop taking history and start learning.
Logged

Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2006-2008, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!