Poll (Sure to be Uncomfortable)

[Blahmicho]

don't

what the are you talking about?!?

[Rob Zombie]

I put 'probably' because you dont have to be a palmtree to do the act.

You could be at gun point, knife point, baseball bat point, ball point pen, any other kind of point....or you know, on some kind of hard drug, or raped. Or you could be doing it because it gets your girlfriend off....I dont know what kind of kinks are out there

In short, you dont have to be, but it helps (lol)

[Cold Seether]

Out of Carlin's 7 dirty words we only have two of them replaced here. Interesting.

Hmm... I'd say that you have to be a palmtree to engage in palmtree activity. Well, maybe the drugged-up college experimentation thing could be done, notthat I'd know anything about that since I was older and un-drugged by the time I got to college.

er...

I don't know. My lack of homophobia is based on a belief that it isn't the homosexual's choice to be a homosexual in the first place. If that's not the case, and being homosexual is a choice that is being made consciously, then I'd have to reevaluate my feelings on that matter and I don't like doing that because I'm usually too busy typing overly long responses to simple questions that weren't directly asked to me specifically in the first place.

[Mill Wilkinson]

If paid enough, man can go to great lengths... 

[Master Lucky]

If paid enough, man can go to great lengths... 

I got to hide my money...

[Cthulhu]

Ummmmm... I voted yes, but I was making the assumption that both men shagged each other on a regular basis. Otherwise, if it's one off, or on occasion, I'd say he was Bi.

I had pizza for lunch today.

[Foo]

I had pizza for lunch today.

Me too! 

Concerning the question, all I say is: warm cavities. Oh, and: prisons.

[Master Lucky]

I had pizza for lunch today.

Me too! 

Concerning the question, all I say is: warm cavities. Oh, and: prisons.

I agree.

[Buttercup]

^ Apparently subject lines are unfiltered.

I voted no.

You hear stories of people who are but dated/married the opposite gender due to social pressures and what not. Don't know if/what social pressures could make it go the other way (e.g. straight people dating/marrying the same gender); just pointing out that there's reasons for people to go opposite of their natural inclinations.

People enjoy themselves with objects, can't say that proves they have a specific sexual attraction to the objects themselves. In the same way I can't say it proves a man is, or it causes him to be, when he has sex. The two are not quite the same thing. 

Of course, lets say someone -does- like the same gender in that special way. They still might not want to be labeled  . You never see in the tabloids, "Could it be that <celebrity> is actually straight?" Guys don't give each other crap by saying, "OMG, you're so straight!" You never hear about "the heterosexual lifestyle". You don't have to "come out" about being attracted to the opposite sex - it's assumed. You don't need to tell people "I'm straight", you say, " That guy's cute," or, "She's hot," or, "I'd like you to meet my wife." If I liked girls I'd want it to be left at, "I like girls," without being called a lesbian the same way I would say, "I like guys," without people remarking, "You're a heterosexual?!"

So, yeah, if a guy wants to call himself straight, whether he likes other guys a little, a lot, or not at all, regardless of what he does/doesn't do with them, I say go ahead. It's a private feeling, so... yeah. Plus there's the fact that sex is 100% effective at preventing pregnancy, so probably some people who'd rather go hetero do it for that reason.

[Lady Une]

I'm....uh.....heterosexual for Bridget?

Just doesn't have the same ring to it. :/

[Skull Face]

No.

[buzzmong]

Depends really in my view.

If it was a one of "Will I like it type thing" which happens once or twice then no, thoust doesn't have to be , just curious (applies not just to men, which is what this topic is about)

However, if it was a consistantly repeated act, then you're either homosexual or bisexual, you could deny it, but actions speak louder than words.

I voted No on the premise that it was a one time event, I'd vote yes if it was specifically repeated actions, and as Blahmicho later stated it's regarding a partner of his, my second statement applies.

[Here to Kill Lacuna]

My general practice through life has been to ignore labels and shag anything willing.

It was going fine until last year and that bike,  now I'm a sex offender.


I certainly wouldn't say you'd have to be faaabulous to shag someone of the same gender, there's no reason to label yourself just because you wanna stick it somewhere warm and paint the place white.

But by the same measure, claiming stone cold heterosexuality while ball-deep in a guy, that'd be a bit confusing to me,  but hell, who am I to question what labels people want?

All of this stuff just leaves me talking in circles and pining for exes, do what the hell you like, and however you like it (Assuming SSC and abiding to hard limits)


Oh, and dymo machines are bloody awesome, especially the old metal tape ones. 

[Naughty Sorceress]

One's orientation is like their preference of indulging or abstaining alcohol. Neither is evil or of poor character and one drink in an entire lifetime can not truly tarnish a teetotaler if they are genuinely not interested in alcohol afterwards. Unfortunately, even curiosity can not provide an alibi for all cases; people do lie to themselves if they are uncomfortable (sometimes even thinking it was a mistake to like the opposite gender if they are particularly flamboyant or tomboyish).

Personally, I do what I feel comfortable with regardless of any perceived self image as it really isn't important if you are heterosexual, bisexual, or homosexual.